The news came as part of Home Office’s lawyers’ submissions to the Supreme Court on Friday as an attempt was made to block an expulsion flight as part of the government’s controversial new policy of removing asylum seekers. Five people who were to be deported next week have now had their removal instructions canceled. Two campaign groups – Detention Action and Care4Calais – have joined the PCS Union and four individual asylum seekers have filed a lawsuit against the Home Office after announcing that the first group of people will be sent to Rwanda on Tuesday. Lawyers for almost 100 additional immigrants have filed lawsuits seeking to remain in the UK. Downing Street said Boris Johnson was still hoping the first flight would take place next week. The court was also informed that a second flight could be scheduled for Thursday, which the Interior Ministry denied. A spokesman for No. 10 said: “Yes. You are aware of the case that is pending today, but we have stated our position on why we believe this is the right approach.”
More on Immigrant Crossings
The Interior Ministry “intends to arrange further flight or flights to Rwanda this year,” his lawyer said. However, the event before the end of the full hearing will “depend on how many people leave on the flight on Tuesday,” he added. Those who took action called for the decision to be stopped altogether if the decision was in their favor – meaning that the decision would not apply only to the asylum seekers they represent. “It is not safe” In the first stage of the lawsuit, which was filed today, Raza Husain QC told the Supreme Court: “The system is not secure. It’s not that it is not safe after July, it just is not safe. “You may be arbitrarily denied access to it. If you do, there are concerns about impartiality in decision-making.” He continued: “The evidence is that if you are not from a neighboring country, then there are high levels of rejection.” Mr Husain said this included Syrian asylum seekers who were widely accepted by the UK system. “The process is just insecure,” he said. The Interior Ministry is asking the court to dismiss the lawsuit In court documents, Home Office lawyers urged the court to reject the application, arguing that it “fails in the first instance”, adding: “The plaintiffs have not identified a serious issue to be tried, let alone the strong case they claim for the granting of relief in the trial “. The Supreme Court has been informed that the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) has had a number of concerns about the asylum process in Rwanda, including discriminatory access to asylum – including LGBT people – lack of legal representation and representation. The Supreme Court is set to hear a further challenge to the policy on Monday, which was made by the refugee charity Asylum Aid and backed by the Freedom From Torture peer group. Care4Calais says it knew about nine Afghans. 35 Sudanese? 18 Syrians. 14 Iranians; 11 Egyptians as well as Iraqis, Pakistanis, Albanians, Algerians, Chadians, Eritreans, Turks and Vietnamese, who were told they could be transported on the first flight. “Tough” and “inhuman” The plan, which the government said would provide “safe and legal” routes for migrants, has been described as “inhuman” and “cruel” by human rights groups. According to the plans, those seeking illegal refuge in the country will be placed on chartered flights to Rwanda where they will enter the Rwandan asylum system and will not be considered for return to the United Kingdom. It comes as the latest figures show that more than 10,000 migrants have crossed the Channel into the UK so far this year. We will answer any questions you may have about this and UK immigration policy tonight at 7pm on Sky News – Freeview Channel 233. You can send your Inquiries to [email protected] Follow the Daily Podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker James Wilson, deputy director of Detention Action, said: “In her desire to punish asylum seekers by forcing them to board a flight to Rwanda, Pretty Patel has exceeded her authority. “With the hasty implementation that we say is an illegal policy, it turns a blind eye to the many clear dangers and human rights violations that it would cause to people seeking asylum. “It’s vital that the new government policies respect and abide by the laws that we all, as a society, have agreed to follow. That is why we are seeking a mandate not to leave this Rwandan plane off the runway.” Home Office Defends ‘World-Leading Partnership’ Image: Minister of the Interior Priti Patel A spokeswoman for the Interior Ministry said earlier: “We were clear from the beginning that we expected legal challenges, but we are determined to implement this new partnership. “We have now issued formal instructions to the first group of people to relocate to Rwanda later this month. This marks a crucial step towards the operational implementation of the policy, which is fully compliant with international and national law.”
